On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:28:38 -0500 Kent Tenney <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's fairly rare for me to sprinkle comments and statements between > defs, so my concern was with their disappearance. I can see however > that a file can be contrived which would be confusing in the other direction. Not really sure what the next step is. I think you, zpcspm, and I are of the same opinion, but Edward differs. Does this mean... options? Arghh, the horror! :) So, behaviors would be... All non-def blocks get their own node... except stuff immediately following the class line, which goes in the same node as the class line. (Kent, zpcspm, me) or, controlled by an option, interspersed code is automagically grouped with the def to which it's most relevant. I guess I'm not 100% clear on the current behavior. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
