On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Kent Tenney <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I short: I think it would be nice if users would have a custom option >> to control the logic of code splitting This is an interesting topic. More flexibility would be good, imo. The question is, how to get it? Because we are talking about @auto, we can't make many assumptions about coding style: that's up to the original authors of the code. We could consider per-file options that say, in effect, I want *this* file formatted like *this*. These options can be cached if we continue to assume that can't alter the files themselves. Alternatively, a leo-editor line, similar to a vim line, could specify options. Such lines aren't odious. I continue to believe that code "fragments" belong with either the preceding or following node, but if we have per-file options that's only a preference that can be over-ridden These are just preliminary thoughts... Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
