On Jun 15, 9:49 pm, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Not really sure what the next step is. I think you, zpcspm, and I are of the > same opinion, but Edward > differs. Does this mean... options? Arghh, the horror! :)
My requirement is lighter and I can live with the current state of things. Yes, I have complained earlier about a similar pattern. But I mostly encounter it when dealing with legacy code (which is not my own). I import this code into leo using @shadow. I short: I think it would be nice if users would have a custom option to control the logic of code splitting, but this has implications (at least more complexity of the importing code). I understand this is a clear situation when the best can become an enemy of the good. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
