--- On Fri, 8/6/10, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> After this Aha, it is obvious that I don't want to use > @root, think about @root, document @root or test @root. None of which are sufficient reasons for removing it, of course ;-) > And I don't want Leo's newbies to do so either. This might be a stronger reason. I've never used it, so I won't miss it. > Without @root, Chapter 4 would be less than half as long > and would actually be easy to understand :-) As usual, any > simplification of Chapter 4 would likely lead to further collapses in > complexity. On the complexity topic, while I was working on the windows \absolute\path problem (which is non-urgently awaiting your input, BTW) I was surprised by the number of methods which do similar things to determine the path of an @<file> node. I can understand how such complexity could have evolved, but I suspect there's room for simplification. Maybe after you've had time to look at the \absolute\path bug, which isn't urgent. Cheers -Terry Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
