On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:38:25 -0500 "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Are there technical reasons preventing the creation of a "Declaration" > > node to contain them? > > Imo, the problem is that Leo would have to do AI in order to determine > whether non-def could should be placed in the the preceding or > following node. While fully understanding your juggling :-) I think Kent and I want something relatively simple; an option to have the load logic stick inter-def code in its own node, no AI required. If you don't like the results, don't enable the option. The only case where I think Leo must put inter-def stuff in a def node is @decorators. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
