On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>> A branch will not be needed. Indeed, the code could stay the same, >> except for two or three places. Rather, it is the docs that would >> change: newbies would think that only Qt exists. Existing users would >> be free to use Tk and Tk plugins. > > I'm not sure if zpcspm meant a branch or a tag, or perhaps they're the same > thing in bzr..., no, they're not, so perhaps a tag make as much sense as a > branch. But I think zpcspm's point was that you can then point people who > must use Tk to the branch/tag/revision at which Tk support was best, because > it's only going to go down hill from here. I'm not going to do this. And there is no need to do so. As Ville says, Qt is already the default, or is the default *almost* everywhere. I'll have to track down several special cases. In particular the code that tells how to put up "emergency" dialogs and prompts for the contents of .leoID.txt. But such special cases will not affect existing Tk users, so in effect we can deprecate Tk simply by changing the docs. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
