On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:15:04 -0500 "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure if zpcspm meant a branch or a tag, or perhaps they're the same > > thing in bzr..., no, they're not, so perhaps a tag make as much sense as a > > branch. But I think zpcspm's point was that you can then point people who > > must use Tk to the branch/tag/revision at which Tk support was best, > > because it's only going to go down hill from here. > > I'm not going to do this. And there is no need to do so. As Ville > says, Qt is already the default, or is the default *almost* > everywhere. > > I'll have to track down several special cases. In particular the code > that tells how to put up "emergency" dialogs and prompts for the > contents of .leoID.txt. But such special cases will not affect > existing Tk users, so in effect we can deprecate Tk simply by changing > the docs. I think the issue is, do you expect the functionality of Tk to stay at its present level or to decline over time? I would assume the latter, in which case some marker for the current revision would be useful when someone must use Tk and wants the best Tk leo there ever was. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
