On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, it might be an interesting plugin. Just downloaded TreeLine. It's all right as far as it goes, but it reminds me of the failed attempt to define settings graphically in Leo. For Leo, @settings trees are much simpler and more flexible. By analogy, the Leonine way to define templates/forms would be to use @form trees, rather than the dialogs that TreeLine uses. Perhaps that is a minor point. More importantly, we would want to define a set of commands to specify the form to be used for any particular node, or tree of nodes. These commands would set the "form" uA. In *some* cases, using forms to specify data might indeed be useful. In fact, one could imagine forms that specify uA's... Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
