On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Matt Wilkie <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can't help wondering what this exploration might mean > for python-to-C. In other words is this something that could > conceivably lead to round tripping? python-to-c. There is a lot of work in that area. I doubt that we will ever get to round-tripping. See my recent answer to Ville for a discussion of what I do expect might be the result of c-to-python. > (disclaimer I know zilch about C, > and don't aim to. I just see smart people using it decades after other > newer/shinier/"better" languages are available everywhere). There is a role for C, for implementing Python interpreters, and in all other situations where speed is paramount. However, part of my mission is to wrap as much C code as possible in Python so that people can use the speed in more clever ways. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
