On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:53:24 -0500 > Kent Tenney <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Another consideration is to choose the simplest, least intrusive, >> > escape sequence that could possibly work. >> >> I'm inclined towards one which is legal in a browser location bar. > > I agree, I can't really see how any escape is non-ugly, and at least > --%3E has a defined interpretation. I don't think '-->' would occur in > headlines very often? Unless you have a workflow which is causing it > to.
My interest is UNLs which identify a node for database purposes, so I don't care about ugly. I wouldn't mind if "-->" was illegal in a headline ... > >> The question is what does g.get_UNL(p, True) return? > > My current question is why g.get_UNL(p, True) and not p.get_UNL(True)? Good question. > > Cheers -Terry > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
