On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Kent Tenney <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Another consideration is to choose the simplest, least intrusive, >>> escape sequence that could possibly work. >> >> I'm inclined towards one which is legal in a browser location bar. > > Certainly reasonable. In *some* sense it is the most intuitive. But > it may be too ugly. > > An idea: could we arrange a "magic copy" that will create what you > want while keeping the visible UNL's unchanged?
That sounds like what the "escape" switch is for, by default g.get_UNL(p) returns the status line version (p.h with --> separator) Actually, if Edward blesses a g.get_UNL(p) function, that's sufficient, I can munge it to an address as I want, others will probably have different needs. I don't think a position knows the name of the file it is in, so I couldn't get what I'm after from g.get_UNL(p, True) anyway. I guess all I want is someone to bless an efficient implementation of g.get_UNL(p) which returns the regular "p.h-->p.h-->" style. Thanks, Kent > > Edward > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
