> @nosent foo.html
Thanks for the info.
So I've ran into a new problem. I organized the website into its separate
nodes, and then created an "Output" node by hand (in the future, it would be
generated by a script) that maps all the template data and content into
files. I think the best way to organize it would be to have the @file nodes
contain a clone of the base template node, which would then contain the
content as its children. So it would look like:
@file index.html
|__Base Template
|__Index
|__<< title >>
|__<< content >>
And the base template would include << title >> and << content >>. The
problem is obvious: a clone of the Base Template includes chilren, so this
doesn't work for multiple pages. A hackish work-around is to copy the base
template instead of clone it, but is it a possibility to have a childless
clone? I'm wondering if this is the only situation in which a childless
clone would be useful.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Terry Brown <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:42:01 -0500
> Jeff Aigner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to create an output file that doesn't have any of the Leo
> > metadata in it?
>
> @nosent foo.html
>
> http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/directives.html
>
> Cheers -Terry
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
