On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> What do you think of this approach overall? >> >> Seems pretty elegant from where I'm looking. > > I agree. > >> On this particular matter, I care more about having the right defaults >> (optimal out of the box experience), i.e. no need to touch @settings.
And if "named styles" existed, AKA "themes", one could choose between different versions of "right defaults" > > I suppose we shall have to discuss what we think the "right" defaults > are--it's a rare case of having to discuss preferences. > > My strong preference is for an active indication of the pane that has > focus. My preference won't change, but I won't grieve if the > consensus is different from that. > > Edward > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
