On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Kent Tenney <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Right, IYO it is a convenience, IMO it is critical. >> The difference is due to different learning styles and problem domain. > > Ok, so it's critical. It's also not the question I was asking :-)
My point is not whether it's critical or not, my point is that it's a matter of opinion. The same holds for breakthroughs. A breakthrough for one is a convenience, or possibly an annoyance for another. A core breakthrough for Leo is the cloned node, you leverage them to great advantage, they haven't resonated with me. Leo _itself_ is the breakthrough tool for understanding. It's a platform for data management like no other. As a platform, it can provide the tools to break through barriers to understanding complexity by accommodating our proclivities. Hopefully. Thanks, Kent > > Edward > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
