On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> More generally, why do I not think the tree is all we'll ever need? > Well, why is a tree better than a list of text-nodes? All it does is > make it easier to see the structure, it doesn't let you do anything you > couldn't do with a list. Making it easier to see the structure is the > point, and not all structures can be folded into trees without the user > sacrificing some brain space for the translation. A valid point. It may be the deciding point. Otoh, I have been thinking about new kind of classes as the basis for a new kind of understanding. Too vague to say more at present. In that context, I think we had better not have back links ;-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
