Iirc, ipy_leo is leo 'helpers' that you load from ipython (as ipython
plugin), and ipython.py is a leo plugin that enables the ipython bridge.
Having them be separate seems natural to me, and users only know about
ipython.py.
On Apr 1, 2012 2:29 AM, "Edward K. Ream" <edream...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In practice, the separation of code between the ipython.py plugin and
> leo/external/ipy_leo.py is inconvenient for me and a bit confusing for
> users.  Indeed, Leo's --ipython command-line arg should be all that is
> needed to create the ILeo bridge.
>
> I plan to fold the code in ipython.py and ipy_leo.py into a single
> file.  There seems to be no reason why this file should not be part of
> Leo's core, say leoIPython.py.
>
> Ville, do have any comments?
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.

Reply via email to