On 8/9/2013 10:20 AM, dufriz wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Jacob Peck <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:On 8/9/2013 10:13 AM, dufriz wrote:On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Very few people talk about it and the user community seems to be quite small. It's hard to say. For example, a single download to a professor can, and has, represented dozens or hundreds of users. This reminds me: Leo should encourage users to send "postcards" to us so that we can have a better idea of who is actually using Leo. Couldn't you include an automatic update feature into the program, which will signal the presence of an instance of Leo being used?While possible, it would be akin to spying, and I for one wouldn't want that.Spying?!? That would not reveal any private information at all. It would only reveal that one instance of Leo is running.
Which is more than some users feel comfortable revealing. Just saying. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
