the only thing I have to add to the other excellent comments is a wondering: why is the at-comand `@rst` and the x-command `rst3` ? Do they _have_ to be different?
And: elsewhere (everywhere else?) we use `@ ....@c` for comments. Are there specific technical reasons this isn't used for rst or is this just historical accident? if the latter, would it be feasible to standardize and allow the same syntax for rst? This would be as an addition to `@rst-no-head` etc. as I'm quite sure there are voluminous historical files where their use is common. On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:15 PM, lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > In the 'Specify settings' section can you clarify if these should be in > the document being written or in myLeosettings.leo ? > If they can be part of the document should they be in a separate node? > > Your efforts on the documentation are appreciated. > > Thanks > Lewis > > > On Saturday, October 26, 2013 2:50:47 AM UTC+11, Edward K. Ream wrote: >> >> http://leoeditor.com/tutorial-**rst3.html<http://leoeditor.com/tutorial-rst3.html> >> >> This was not easy. All suggestions welcome. >> >> Edward >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
