On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 00:02:23 -0500 "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> ​Here is the output: > abbrev-kill-all It still seems to me it would be good to have the docs. in the source... that the doc. string for the command should be sufficient documentation in most cases, no doubt there are exceptions. For example, help-for-command abbrev-kill-all "delete all abbreviations" so it has some documentation. Alternatively, if the documentation is separate from the command definition, would it be at all helpful to have commands with their own rst class, :cmd:`abbrev-kill-all`, in the doc.s, to allow them to be identified? Just thinking aloud. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
