Right, and the bindings are great for someone coming to vim via Leo, hence only interested in the ones Leo implements.
I'm talking about users with vim experience, they will be drawn to the 'edit file in vim' feature which offers the full benefit of both Leo and vim. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Edward K. Ream <edream...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Kent Tenney <kten...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Ville M. Vainio <vivai...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > There is another thread on focusing on marketing instead of feature >> > development. I agree on this (esp. for features like vim-bindings, which >> > would likely be misplacement of limited development time, as vim users >> > will >> > always be using vim and the result would be bad anyway). >> >> Agreed. The way to make vim users happy is with solid >> <alt-x> open-file-in-vim >> for the @xxxx externals. >> Implementing a subset, however large, of vim capabilities, causes >> frustration. > > > Maybe, but the vim work is already complete. I see no reason to rip it out. > > Edward > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
