Am Dienstag, 22. September 2015 12:54:49 UTC+2 schrieb john lunzer: > > Leo's stability in code manipulation is not prone to failure, it is very > deterministic. > You mean node-manipulation? Because actual code-manipulation does not seem to be a feature from Leo. Leo just copies node-contents together, without understanding them. It doesn't uses an
appropiated styleguide, doesn't correct code, does not even format it to match the result. >From my experience, all leo does is shifting content around. And for this the traditional tools are already good enough for most people, especially if their environment is already enriched with other tools for refactoring code. I think it is a lack of "popular" features like linters and > code-analysis/introspection tools (jedi or rope) that cause people to look > over Leo. > What do you think is Leo's audience and against what applications does it compete? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
