Hello Don.

Glad you're interested in this initiative.    Rob and I (see above) had a 
good/productive conversation today and it seems like we're converging on a 
short list of items that will really help bridge the Ecco to Leo gap.   

I'm going to see if we can get a call set up, for those who'd like to 
contribute ideas / time / etc., sometime mid to late next week.

Looking fwd to connecting further on this.

-Richard

On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 10:27:03 AM UTC-8, Don Dwiggins wrote:
>
> On 1/21/16 10:13 AM, Don Dwiggins wrote:
>
> Thanks for tackling this, and keep me in the loop.  I'm a programmer (and 
> one of the "Ecco refugees"), but with little time to spare.  Still, with 
> proper motivation, I might be able to free up a block of time now and then 
> to implement something.
>
>
> One additional thought: there's an Ecco template that supports David 
> Allen's }"Getting Things Done"; I've been learning it to improve my own 
> effectiveness.  It has a combination of features that would make a good 
> test case for this project (probably down the road a bit).
>
>
> Don
>
>
>
> Don
>
> Question: given the range of features that Ecco has, what do folks think 
> would be the priorities?
>
> On 1/20/16 12:01 PM, Richard Andersen wrote:
>
> Thanks for your interest, Jon. 
>
> A small group is coming together, so let's pool some ideas and see what 
> can be done.
>
> I'm going to schedule a demo of what I've done for a few who are 
> interested to kick things off.    Edward (creator of Leo) was generous in 
> spending some time with me to discuss this and it seems like the Leo 
> architecture + some existing plug-ins make it suitable to accomplish quite 
> a bit without a ton of work.
>
> -Richard
>
> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 3:18:01 AM UTC-8, jkn wrote: 
>>
>> You'll have seen my name in some of the 'Ecco Refugees' type threads, 
>> although I came to Leo independantly of that. I *am* something of a 
>> programmer, if that helps, although only a beginner as far as working 
>> within Leo.
>>
>> Would be interested in hearingmore of your work via PM or whatever.
>>
>>     Regards
>>     Jon N ('jkn')
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 1:02:26 AM UTC, Richard Andersen wrote: 
>>>
>>> Sounds good, Rob. 
>>>
>>> I'll show you what I've put together so far to get your input.    Will 
>>> PM you to find some time.
>>>
>>> Thanks for offering to participate!    Beta testing and providing input 
>>> will certainly help.
>>>
>>> -Richard
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 4:36:02 PM UTC-8, Largo84 wrote: 
>>>>
>>>> I'm interested in your project as an 'ECCO refuge', but I'm not much of 
>>>> a programmer, so I don't know how much help I can be (except as an 
>>>> interested observer and possibly beta tester). 
>>>>
>>>> Rob............
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 12:21:05 PM UTC-5, Richard Andersen 
>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello all. 
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm checking to see if there are any members of the community who'd be 
>>>>> interested in working on / supporting / contributing to what I think will 
>>>>> be a great project, and one that aligns well with Leo's amazing 
>>>>> capabilities.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am a long-time EccoPro user and have recently discovered Leo.   I'm 
>>>>> getting a lot of benefit from Leo already and have effectively utilized a 
>>>>> couple components...
>>>>>
>>>>> - quicksearch (which creates the "Nav" tab)
>>>>> - nodetags (which creates the "Tags" tab) -- many thanks to Jake Peck 
>>>>> for his help! 
>>>>>
>>>>> ... and have a few other coding/configuration changes in mind which, I 
>>>>> think, will make Leo a great alternative to EccoPro for many users.    I 
>>>>> saw an earlier posting from some "Ecco refugees" which seems to indicate 
>>>>> some wider interest in this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm planning to use Leo for coding as well, but am tackling this 
>>>>> "organizer" task as a first priority.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please respond if you're interested.    I am open to whatever 
>>>>> combination of paid / other efforts can help move this along.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Richard
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to