On 1/25/16 11:07 AM, Richard Andersen wrote:
(snip)
The goal of this project, as of now, is not to replace Ecco Pro per
se, but rather to inform a direction for Leo in the area of personal
organizer (a purpose for which, out of the box, Leo is very well-suited).
Good characterization of the project. Replacing Ecco Pro, while
worthwhile, should be a separate downstream effort, once we have
something that's solid and working well, and undertaken with the folks
on the current ecco_pro mailing list (many of them are using Slang's
work to extend Ecco's functionality in ways that would need to be
"ported" in order to replace the combination).
I'd like to see how many can make a call this Wed or Thurs. I can
set up a conf bridge. I'll also demo how I'm using nodetags.py +
quicksearch.py with really good results. Perhaps others can share
some of the techniques they use as well.
Please let me know if you're interested in joining and how your
calendar looks for those days or, alternatively, next week.
Yes, I can make it those days; I'm in the PST zone, if that's an issue.
Don
-Richard
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 10:34:37 AM UTC-8, Don Dwiggins wrote:
On 1/22/16 5:34 AM, Jacob Peck wrote:
I know it's not quite exactly the same, but for a while I was
using a home-brewed system I called LTD (Leo Things Done), that
leveraged the power of Leo and a few custom plugins (now part of
the codebase) to organize my life. I fell out of the habit, but
it was quite effective for me for a while.
Here's a writeup, in case someone finds it handy:
http://blog.suspended-chord.info/2013/11/18/leo-things-done-revised/
<http://blog.suspended-chord.info/2013/11/18/leo-things-done-revised/>
-->Jake
Dang! At a first scan, your LTD looks similar to the way I use
Ecco outlines for my various tasks (and have been for several
years). If/when I get a moment, I may play with it to see if I'm
right. If so, I might be able to start using Leo/LTD for part of
what I need.
Thanks,
Don
On 1/22/2016 6:35 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Richard Andersen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Also, I do agree that a GTD use-cased based model is a great
way to focus and validate the Leo mods we're aiming for.
Yes. This would be an interesting project.
EKR
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor
<https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
<https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor
<https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
<https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
