Also, I do agree that a GTD use-cased based model is a great way to focus
and validate the Leo mods we're aiming for.
-Richard
On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 6:50:18 PM UTC-8, Richard Andersen wrote:
>
> Hello Don.
>
> Glad you're interested in this initiative. Rob and I (see above) had a
> good/productive conversation today and it seems like we're converging on a
> short list of items that will really help bridge the Ecco to Leo gap.
>
> I'm going to see if we can get a call set up, for those who'd like to
> contribute ideas / time / etc., sometime mid to late next week.
>
> Looking fwd to connecting further on this.
>
> -Richard
>
> On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 10:27:03 AM UTC-8, Don Dwiggins wrote:
>>
>> On 1/21/16 10:13 AM, Don Dwiggins wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for tackling this, and keep me in the loop. I'm a programmer (and
>> one of the "Ecco refugees"), but with little time to spare. Still, with
>> proper motivation, I might be able to free up a block of time now and then
>> to implement something.
>>
>>
>> One additional thought: there's an Ecco template that supports David
>> Allen's }"Getting Things Done"; I've been learning it to improve my own
>> effectiveness. It has a combination of features that would make a good
>> test case for this project (probably down the road a bit).
>>
>>
>> Don
>>
>>
>>
>> Don
>>
>> Question: given the range of features that Ecco has, what do folks think
>> would be the priorities?
>>
>> On 1/20/16 12:01 PM, Richard Andersen wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your interest, Jon.
>>
>> A small group is coming together, so let's pool some ideas and see what
>> can be done.
>>
>> I'm going to schedule a demo of what I've done for a few who are
>> interested to kick things off. Edward (creator of Leo) was generous in
>> spending some time with me to discuss this and it seems like the Leo
>> architecture + some existing plug-ins make it suitable to accomplish quite
>> a bit without a ton of work.
>>
>> -Richard
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 3:18:01 AM UTC-8, jkn wrote:
>>>
>>> You'll have seen my name in some of the 'Ecco Refugees' type threads,
>>> although I came to Leo independantly of that. I *am* something of a
>>> programmer, if that helps, although only a beginner as far as working
>>> within Leo.
>>>
>>> Would be interested in hearingmore of your work via PM or whatever.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Jon N ('jkn')
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 1:02:26 AM UTC, Richard Andersen
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good, Rob.
>>>>
>>>> I'll show you what I've put together so far to get your input. Will
>>>> PM you to find some time.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for offering to participate! Beta testing and providing input
>>>> will certainly help.
>>>>
>>>> -Richard
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 4:36:02 PM UTC-8, Largo84 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm interested in your project as an 'ECCO refuge', but I'm not much
>>>>> of a programmer, so I don't know how much help I can be (except as an
>>>>> interested observer and possibly beta tester).
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob............
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 12:21:05 PM UTC-5, Richard Andersen
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm checking to see if there are any members of the community who'd
>>>>>> be interested in working on / supporting / contributing to what I think
>>>>>> will be a great project, and one that aligns well with Leo's amazing
>>>>>> capabilities.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am a long-time EccoPro user and have recently discovered Leo. I'm
>>>>>> getting a lot of benefit from Leo already and have effectively utilized
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> couple components...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - quicksearch (which creates the "Nav" tab)
>>>>>> - nodetags (which creates the "Tags" tab) -- many thanks to Jake Peck
>>>>>> for his help!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... and have a few other coding/configuration changes in mind which,
>>>>>> I think, will make Leo a great alternative to EccoPro for many users.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> saw an earlier posting from some "Ecco refugees" which seems to indicate
>>>>>> some wider interest in this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm planning to use Leo for coding as well, but am tackling this
>>>>>> "organizer" task as a first priority.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please respond if you're interested. I am open to whatever
>>>>>> combination of paid / other efforts can help move this along.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "leo-editor" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "leo-editor" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
