I think limiting it purely to python would be aiming too low. But even if it was it would likely be easy to extend via native subprocess package or the third-party sh package (one of my favorite packages).
On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 10:50:25 AM UTC-5, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: > > I agree. I'm now making table formating on org-mode and literate computing > on Grafoscopio. If I need to prioritize a feature that would attract more > diverse users to Leo would be literate computing. That has been our case > with Grafoscopio and our Data Week hackathon+workshop[1] have participants > from several life venues and disciplines: Jorunalism, philosophy, > communication studies, developers, teachers, students, among others. > They're more attracted by the interactive data storytelling features that > by table formating. > [1] http://mutabit.com/dataweek/ > > If I would have to choose only one feature to be enabled in Leo 5.6 that > would be literate computing (even if is limited "only" to Python). > > Cheers, > > Offray > > On 01/03/17 09:48, john lunzer wrote: > > While it would be pretty great to have full auto-reformatting ascii > org-mode tables my inclination is that there are higher priority org-mode > features that should be tackled first (for example, functionality enabling > literate programming). > > On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 8:39:25 AM UTC-5, Arjan wrote: >> >> > In particular, emulating org-mode tables (including its spreadsheet >> features) seems like a lot of work. >> >> I use Leo primarily as an information manager (as well as for writing >> LaTeX), and I very frequently need to capture some tabular information. For >> me this would be a central feature for Leo as PIM. (It's actually what kept >> me from switching from Emacs/OrgMode to Leo for several months. Now I use >> Leo anyway, but keep larger sections of tabular data in LibreOffice Calc or >> SQLite, or use some plain text separator in a node body. Both of these >> workarounds are suboptimal.) >> >> So I'm hoping it's important to others as well, and will turn out to be >> doable! >> >> In any case, it's very nice to see all the recent activity. >> >> Arjan >> >> >> On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 4:55:53 PM UTC+1, Offray Vladimir Luna >> Cárdenas wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 28/02/17 10:39, Edward K. Ream wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas < >>> off...@riseup.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Just for curiosity, I wonder if the Babel approach taken by org-mode is >>>> client sever [1]. I have the "feeling" is not, but I have not still read >>>> the papers. >>>> >>>> [1] https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v046i03 >>>> >>> I would consult Babels docs >>> <http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/>, not some academic paper >>> ;-) >>> >>> >>> Thanks. I will read both ;-). >>> >>> Offray >>> >>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to leo-editor+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to leo-e...@googlegroups.com > <javascript:>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
