On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Matt Wilkie <[email protected]> wrote:

Would it be easier to invert the process, and have dedicated releases
> branches and then master never needs to be frozen?
>

​Anything is possible, but I don't see how doing all the work outside of
master is any improvement.  At some point we have to freeze *something*.
Furthermore, the scheme you suggests seems to make master almost
irrelevant, which does not seem reasonable.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to