On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Kent Tenney <[email protected]> wrote:
> Although the Leo way is working, it might be advantageous to > adopt what has become standard, making potential contributors > more comfortable: working on a develop branch instead of master. > > Along these lines, issuing pull requests instead of pushing is a > good way for changes to be vetted. > > I was interested to see that Jim Fulton issues pull requests for > his changes to his own code base, allowing users to see what > he is up to. > > Certainly hard to know the cost/benefit of any of this stuff. > ​Thanks for these comments. For now I'd like things to remain as they are. The "standard" work flow is certainly reasonable for larger groups of programmers. Also, I don't understand how we tell people to get bleeding edge code if master is stodgy. Any other comments? Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
