On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Terry Brown wrote:
I think with the release branch approach master is the place for > finished projects being tested, sort of what it is now, it's just that > instead of people having to switch between "ok to use master" and "not > ok to use master", it's always ok to use master - all you have to do > is not put new breaky stuff in the release branch, which no one > would do by accident anyway. > I like this approach. The difference is that people aren't supposed to push to the release branch, which is less restrictive than not pushing to master. Pushing to a release branch is also less likely to happen by accident. And having a separate release branch is the natural place for all release-related commits. I'll use this for all future releases. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
