I would add: you are a programmer that desires powerful code/project organization tools.
I'm not sure what brought me to Leo, but I stayed because I could divide up my code into language agnostic chunks that made sense to me, no longer confined to what any one's syntax had to offer in terms of organization. Leo is a king here. emacs with outshine and ivy can give you cheap imitation of what Leo offers. Obviously there is pharo+grafoscopio but my work culture can't tolerate that level of unorthodoxy, it could barely handle Leo. On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 1:13:21 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > There are two main reasons to use Leo: > > 1. Programmers use Leo's API to write powerful scripts. > > 2. Non programmers use clones to organize data. > > So if you *aren't* a programmer, and you *don't* use clones, then why, > exactly, are you using Leo? You would be much better off with TheBrain > <https://www.thebrain.com/support/tutorials>. Really. > > Edward > > P.S. Imo, all programmers should use clones, but that's a matter of the > next posting. > > EKR > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
