On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:24 PM Zoom.Quiet <zoom.qu...@gmail.com> wrote:
and the true power reason: > 0: programmers use Leo develop and manage projects > Good point. I agree. > So if you aren't a programmer, and you don't use clones, then why, > exactly, are you using Leo? You would be much better off with TheBrain. > Really. > > > > No No No No*42 > Hehe. It seems that you and Joe Orr agree. > TheBrain-style https://www.thebrain.com/support/tutorials > tools just result the fake problem for record minds: > - them try usage chaos mapping as snap for real brain's chaos minds cosmos > - look great and beauty > - but chaos is chaos , chaos info. even put into graph mapping, is can > not help work export > - not like Leo @auto-md / etc. action nodes, the unlimited notes > outline can auto export like .md etc. works file > - the Brain beyond Dynalist/WorkFlowy/...etc. the B-tree list, base > undirected graph > - but when the discuss object need more than 42 nodes to describe... > will make new problems: > - the big image is beyond human's buffer...means we had to more and > more time to review old nodes relation > - the new node must include more relation with faraway nodes, but we > can not easy link them > - even we think hard linked all nodes as right relation, it will make > reader more hard to understand "the Brain" > Many thanks for this. It seems that I don't understand all of the implications of Leo :-) If I understand you, you are saying that Leo's outlines are easier to understand for large data than "good looking" graphs. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
