You can actually do literate programming - meaning explanatory text mixed in with code - with VR3, and you can run the resulting program. You cannot directly currently export the VR3 tree to a file, but you can have VR3 display and export only the code, which you can then get from the browser with select/copy.
Well, except that I seem to have recently introduced a bug so that the code-only view does not show the whole tree but only the current node. I'll have to fix that. On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 1:34:07 PM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 10:40 AM Thomas Passin <tbp1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, one step closer to literate programming without weave, etc. Often I >> use << named sections >> as a kind of pseudo-code to clarify what's going >> on. I'd like it if we could have organizer nodes like this in external >> files, too. > > > Thanks for this comment! I would never have made this (valid) connection, > for several reasons: > > - I don't think of what Leo does (or what I do) as literate programming > (LP). > > - As in traditional LP, Leo's sections typically are static and permanent. > However, my study outlines are temporary. I always delete them after they > have served their purpose. > > In short, one could simulate literate programming with Leo's outlines, but > I don't use Leo this way. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/cb325475-9e5b-4e4e-943f-3a51b17128e2n%40googlegroups.com.
