On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:49 AM Thomas Passin <tbp100...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Trilium undervalues the power of text: > I think that Edward does not appreciate how often users want to use Leo as a Notebook... I agree. Leonistas *should *be able to use lots of graphics :-) That's why improving the VR plugins and (maybe) the rst3 plugin seems like a good idea. > Trillium...shows you a rendered view of its nodes and makes it harder to edit and work with the content. > Leo makes it easy to edit and work with text, but harder to insert and look at rendered graphics, etc. That's a reasonable summary. A floating VR pane would be a step forward. > VR3 can display [jupyter] files using an @jupyter node type. Any text display would only show the raw html... Yes, sometimes the rendered view is preferable. But that's no reason to complicate Leo's interface. *Summary* The Easter Egg is the only way to expand the VR pane. An optional floating VR window would solve that problem. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS1WZmuDxfRg8vU-oWsXKRZOoKSqn2ZP0cGX0Duw_5ys4A%40mail.gmail.com.
