Hello Edward & Thomas, Viktor Ransmayr schrieb am Montag, 14. Oktober 2024 um 16:37:56 UTC+2:
tbp1...@gmail.com schrieb am Montag, 14. Oktober 2024 um 14:59:06 UTC+2: On Monday, October 14, 2024 at 8:43:41 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 7:02 AM Viktor Ransmayr <viktor....@gmail.com> wrote: > Something is awkward with the current state of the new layout system ( at least in my Fedora Linux VM ;-) ... To add a bit more context from my side: * The "@string initial-split-orientation = horizontal" is not a new - but - a quite old configuration setting. * --> I believe at least 4 to 5 years old. - In my Fedora VM I have it as a 'left-over' defined in the "myLeoSettings" outline, while in my Debian VM it is taken (w/o any explicit action on my side) from the "leoSettings" outline I also believe that we should not forget the ~ layout & theming ~ experience offered to first-time Leo users in their 'workbook' outline. This is something, that I plan to look at next (w/o waiting for any changes to the current layout system implementation) ... Here are the notes from my testing of the current layout system state in a ~ fresh ~ installation for a new Leo user: * -> Leo is starting in '<which>' (" - | ") layout w/o a VR pane ... * ==> Body pane of top-level 'Workbook' outline node is initially empty. * ==> According to 'Running Leo' it should contain Leo’s cheat sheet and an example from the rst3 tutorial [1]. * Try 'layout-swap-log-panel' - OK? -> Change to (" | | ") layout w/o a VR pane ... * Try 'layout-swap-log-panel' again - OK -> Change back to (" - | ") layout w/o a VR pane ... * Try 'layout-legacy' - OK? -> Change to 'legacy' (" + ") layout with VR pane using VR as renderer ... * ==> 'Legacy' layout is what's still shown in the screenshot for Leo's main window on the home page. * Try 'layout-restore-default' - Confusing / OK? -> No layout change, i.e. still the 'classical' (" + ") layout with VR pane ... * Try 'layout-big-tree' - OK -> Change to 'big tree' (" ? ") layout with VR pane ... * Use 'layout-restore-default' to change back to 'legacy' (" + ") layout with VR pane ... * Try 'layout-render-focused' - OK? -> Change to 'legacy' (" = | ") layout with VR pane ... * Use 'layout-restore-default' to change back to 'legacy' (" + ") layout with VR pane ... * Try 'layout-horizontal-thirds' - OK? -> Change to 'horizontal thirds' (" ? ") layout with VR pane ... * Use 'layout-restore-default' to change back to 'legacy' (" + ") layout with VR pane ... * Try 'layout-vertical-thirds' - OK? -> Change to 'vertical thirds #1' (" - | | ") layout with VR pane ... * Use 'layout-restore-default' to change back to 'legacy' (" + ") layout with VR pane ... * Try 'layout-vertical-thirds2' - OK? -> Change to 'vertical thirds #2' (" | - | ") layout with VR pane ... * Use 'layout-restore-default' to change back to 'legacy' (" + ") layout with VR pane ... * Try 'layout-quadrant' - Confusing / OK? -> No layout change, i.e. still the 'classical' (" + ") layout with VR pane ... As you (Thomas) already stated in your initial reply to the problem found during my earlier tests: - They do not happen here, because for a fresh installation only the 'viewrendered.py' plugin is enabled. However these new test reveals the following about the layout commands: - layout-legacy == layout-quadrant == layout-restore-default - These commands are doing / providing the same layout ! - This is confusing ( at least for me ;-) I do believe, that the number of layout commands in Leo's core should be reduced to a bare minimum - and - some others (e.g. like 'big tree' & 'vertical thirds #2) should at the most be documented The selection of the minimal commands could be guided by the fact that most (all?) monitors have a rectangular and not a square form. With kind regards, Viktor --- [1] https://leo-editor.github.io/leo-editor/running.html#leo-s-workbook-file -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/bf90d540-8f35-46ee-8d80-58c985eea23fn%40googlegroups.com.