> If needed, I can build a downloadable release; if that's desired. > [Philo, are you willing to ascertain whether there are any bugs that > make it unshippable before I do; once I figure out the 6.0 issue for > you?] > Leonardo already answered... Though building the last version is interesting to see where LeoCAD is heading for us hard core users, it is definitely not good yet for general release (pending modifications in submodels).
> In the meantime, Leonardo, do you think ldconfig.ldr support is a > good idea? I'd like for LeoCAD to use TLG naming, with perhaps a > switch to LDRAW naming on demand if the user wants (after all, you > use your own format now anyway, so sticking with LDRAW naming seems > not-entirely-necessary). > > What do you think? Since I have to cope with MLCad (you know I hate that ;o) also for LPub renderings, I definitely don't want to have to deal with two different names for each piece! Philo _______________________________________________ Leocad mailing list [email protected] https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad
