On Mar 14, 2007, at 11:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What I was suggesting was that LeoCAD support both official naming for > colors, as well as LDRAW naming for those who wanted to turn that > on, and > was asking for feedback on making official naming the default > mode. ldconfig.ldr > support puts total control of the naming and color values > ultimately in the hands > of end-users; I was talking about having LeoCAD go the "step > further" and allow > a switch between naming systems within the software with no extra > work.
If LeoCAD supported ldconfig.ldr then it would be a matter of just replacing your config file to get the new names, I'm ok with that. I could even include both config files in the setup package and let the users pick one in the preferences dialog. To be honest, my color scheme sucks and needs new colors. There's no point in adding a new scheme that no one else is going to use so I should probably just take whatever is the LDraw standard and use it. My only issue is, like I said in my other email, I don't want to display rubber black and black to the users. It would be nice if the color palette changed based on the current piece but I don't think there's a table anywhere of possible materials for each piece so that won't happen. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Leocad mailing list [email protected] https://list.gerf.org/listinfo/leocad
