Don't remember where you asked this but the commits list doesn't
have too many people tracking it.
Redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Actually would it not be a better idea to have an INSTALL.lesstif
which supplements, not replaces, the generic INSTALL ?
The only other thing I can think of is that most of the contents
of INSTALL.lesstif would also fit in the FAQ.
Danny
Alexander Mai wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:40:26 (), Alexander Mai wrote:
>
> >CVSROOT: /cvsroot/lesstif
> >Module name: lesstif
> >Repository: lesstif/doc/www.lesstif.org/
> >Changes by: amai@usw-pr-cvs1. 01/09/11 11:40:26
> >
> >Modified files:
> > lesstif/doc/www.lesstif.org/: INSTALL.html
> >
> >Log message:
> > Small changes. We need to slim down things, for a long time we
> > just _added_ info, never removed redundant stuff ...
>
> Still no comment on my idea to add a generic INSTALL
> (those useless docs ...) to the distribution?!
> Of course it needs a reasonable names, since INSTALL
> is supposed to help the user in the first steps, not
> be a reference for configure's crazy options.
>
> ---
> Alexander Mai
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lesstif-commits mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lesstif-commits
--
Danny Backx ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home page : http://users.skynet.be/danny.backx
Projects: LessTif (http://www.lesstif.org)
Oleo (http://www.gnu.org/software/oleo/oleo.html)
