[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1032
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-20 02:22 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
users:
root:x:0:0
nobody:x:65534:65534
There doesn't seem to be a valid reason for using 65534 anymore. I suggest we
strive to match BLFS which has already solved greater uid/gid issues than LFS
will even encounter.
groups:
root:x:0
console:x:1
BLFS uses bin for gid 1. Since the next gid assigned by BLFS is 14, we have
plenty of breathing room. I suggest either moving console after utmp, or just
incrementing console to utmp by one number. Nothing dictates that we need a gid
1 in a base system.
nogroup:x:65534
Same argument as user nobody.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Why are we hashing this up again. BLFS hasn't adjusted to the new list
yet, since the new list should only be in cross-lfs and the gcc 4 branches.
--
------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
