http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 05:04 ------- Having re-read the discussion about this, I think that the way we should handle this is to a) remove the recommendation of the specific package manager we currently have in 6.1 and b) Put the paragraph pertaining to package management in a Note box. If BLFS are happy to continue maintaining the meat of the Package Management information, I'd prefer it to stay there for the time being at least. We've already set a precedent by referring to Cracklib from Shadow, so asking folks to go and read BLFS at this point isn't too onerous, I don't think. The only other concern I have is that the final note on that page says: "The remainder of this book is to be performed while logged in as user root and no longer as user lfs. Also, double check that $LFS is set." That may well conflict with whatever package management method a user chooses. Do we assume our users are clueful enough that they don't need this conflict explicitly spelled out to them? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
