mutilated misquotes from Robert Connolly's 1 Jan 2006 classic prose may follow:
" No, the book doesn't suggest lying about mercury allergies. I thought it would " be an effective way of avoiding mercury from medical sources. " " There seems to be a very long argument from both sides. [...hack,slash,burn...] Hg is not unique in this; try msg, flouride, cell phone radiation, sunlight, and on and on... No, argument is not hard to find, but truth sure is. But, as far as mercury is concerned, what would really appeal to me in helping to resolve this argument to my satisfaction for me would be some cheap, easy, reliable, accurate way of monitoring my own mercury levels - without my dna, size of my little pinkie and every other piece of personal data winding up in every gubbmint database on the planet. Btw, my dentist warned me against such things as getting amalgam fillings drilled out. According to him, the use of amalgam was 'good dentistry' and anyone on the other side of that argument was, well, clueless. Me? I dunno. R -- http://www.quen.net "Gold needs no endorsement, it can be tested with scales and acids. The recipient of gold does not have to trust the government stamp upon it, if he does not trust the government that stamped it. No act of faith is called for when gold is used in payments, and no compulsion is required." -Benjamin M. Anderson -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-chat FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
