everyone does know this guy's crazy, right? after all, he's just wrote
a giant email instead of just bitching at the ops :)

On 7/8/07, ICMP Request <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologizes accepted. Although I'm not in the mood to be back to IRC
> right now, I will keep being part of *LFS projects through the mailing
> lists.
>
> Regards,
>
> ICMP Request - Don't forget to call me when you ping!
>
> Mail/MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> x86 Intel Prescott 32-bit platform
>
>
> William Harrington wrote:
> > On Jul 6, 2007, at 6:06 PM, ICMP Request wrote:
> >
> >> (This message can be very large but I really ask for you to, if
> >> possible, take some of your time to read it as I think it's worth
> >> reading)
> >>
> >> Dear LFS, BLFS, CLFS, ALFS and related projects community members and
> >> Staff/Developers,
> >>
> >> For many months, I believe that more than one year, I've been using
> >> LFS
> >> and BLFS. Unfortunately, I was not able to use it directly as
> >> sometimes
> >> I've got into health problems, net connection problems, available time
> >> and other miscellaneous problems that unfortunately made me to stay
> >> away
> >> from the LFS project for some months, but I always backed, because it
> >> was never related to an issue or a problem I could have with LFS book,
> >> community nor any members or developers. Frequenting the
> >> irc.linuxfromscratch.org IRC Server and its channels, mainly
> >> #lfs-support until this morning as the alias icmp.request and in the
> >> past as the alias net_priest, it was always a very good place where I
> >> could not only ask questions but also help other members asking
> >> questions (because although I still have a limited knowledge about
> >> LFS I
> >> could try to help people who didn't have any); but of course it was
> >> also
> >> a place where I could chat and interact with people, meeting new
> >> friends, etc.
> >>
> >> Many were the occasions that I've spent a such great time with
> >> members,
> >> giving help, receiving help, and also having a lot of fun which
> >> made me
> >> and other people laugh very much; a perfect balance of a place
> >> where you
> >> don't go only to find and give help, but also to meet new people and
> >> have some fun, of course without deviating of the main purpose that is
> >> to support members who needs help. I really don't know if it's so
> >> right
> >> to use the #lfs-support channel for off-topic conversations, that
> >> would
> >> be very better to use the #lfs one but historically not even new
> >> members
> >> but also all the moderators like to talk about off-topic things on
> >> #lfs-support , as the #lfs channel is mainly desert. At first I
> >> tried to
> >> talk off-topic subjects like "hello, how are you guys?" on #lfs
> >> channel
> >> but when I that saw everyone, including all the moderators, were using
> >> #lfs-support channel not only for support but also for general chat I
> >> gave up this idea. Not that I think it's wrong using #lfs-support for
> >> general chat too, as the IRC LFS Community seems very small so the
> >> channel activity is few enough for that, but if all the members and
> >> moderators adopt this idea I assumed I could also do that without
> >> having
> >> to worry about being 100% on-topic on #lfs-support .
> >>
> >> Before telling what happened, I first would like to say I NEVER
> >> thought
> >> that anyone there should have the obligation to answer or help me with
> >> any issue, being lfs/blfs or not. No one was being paid for that.
> >> For me
> >> it's always like an exchange. I found the book, I read it and I was
> >> really surprised about all the work you made and all the efforts
> >> you are
> >> making to keep, at least LFS and BLFS books (the other projects
> >> books I
> >> don't know because I did not see them, but I don't think they are
> >> different) highly updated, at least for dev versions. I think that
> >> almost every week and in many cases more than once in the week you
> >> update a new svn version of the book, showing that LFS and BLFS
> >> developers worked hard since the beginning and they keep working hard
> >> every day. So it was natural my wish to also give my contribution
> >> by at
> >> least trying to help other members in the past days even with my still
> >> limited knowledge, or at least being part of the LFS channels,
> >> thinking
> >> "wow these guys are working REALLY hard and they deserve my support
> >> and
> >> my recognition for this" . So I was there on the LFS IRC not with the
> >> main objective of ask help, of course it too, but to either try to
> >> support the project in any way by helping new members or at least
> >> showing the IRC developers "hey i'm here on your channel, and I'm
> >> active, I support you, you can count with me if and when you need!"
> >>
> >> Many great staff/moderators I found these days and even in the past
> >> days
> >> some months ago when I used to go there as net_priest on the channel,
> >> like Joe, TheEpitome, a guy who his nick I don't remember but which
> >> starts with the capital letter "A", Ratrophy, and many others. They
> >> were
> >> really not only helping me but also making my day better and I hope I
> >> was doing the same (at least was my wish from the deep of my heart in
> >> gratitude for every help I received from them). Well, until this
> >> morning, 2007-07-06, maybe 2-3AM GMT where the last one, Ratrophy, has
> >> banned me from the #lfs-support channel, an attitude which left me
> >> in a
> >> shock state for the next few minutes, something like "why? what did I
> >> do? I don't believe it!". Ratrophy was always a very active and
> >> contributing moderator, and because of this, I think he was the
> >> moderator that I most had consideration until now. Many were the times
> >> that he helped me or at least tried to help and many was my thanks for
> >> him because of this. But this attitude has really made me
> >> disbelieve not
> >> only on him but consequently on the whole LFS community.
> >>
> >> His reason was simple: I was supposedly asking help for many things
> >> that
> >> were not related to LFS/BLFS projects, including a keyboard daemon
> >> which
> >> was the reason he banned me. Well, here are my points:
> >>
> >> - First of all, I didn't even realize that I was asking so much
> >> help for
> >> things don't related to LFS/BLFS, it was so natural that I really
> >> didn't
> >> realize.
> >> - Second, I was NOT asking for his help about this keyboard daemon
> >> program. I believe you should have the channel logs, you can see it
> >> clearly and of course tell me if I am wrong but I was just commenting
> >> about the program, maybe just to see Ratrophy and other members
> >> opinions
> >> about it. I NEVER said "I would like you to help me with that" or "I
> >> think you should have this program on LFS/BLFS, why don't you have
> >> it?"
> >> or anything like this, I was just commenting about a program that I
> >> thought it was curious and interesting at least to share with the
> >> people
> >> to see what they think about it. Maybe a little LFS off-topic? Sure it
> >> could be, but as I said, #lfs-support was historically an off-topic
> >> chat
> >> and I never thought it would be a problem.
> >> - Third, even if I was did asking for help about this program or even
> >> any LFS-related program, I NEVER thought that helping me was their
> >> obligation. Of course I complained a little before one time (and
> >> when I
> >> said one, it was really just ONE) telling I would like only to listen
> >> something even if like "oh sh*t I don't know" but I repeat now I never
> >> said it was their obligation. They were on the channel for
> >> volunteering
> >> helping the others, just as I was trying to be after realizing the
> >> hard
> >> work you all are doing and after receiving so much help on the past.
> >>
> >> - Forth, and this was the most SERIOUS one: No one, which includes
> >> Ratrophy, has EVER told me to stop off-topic or non-lfs-related
> >> chat if
> >> I was doing it that much and not realizing that. I mean, why didn't he
> >> just told me to stop doing that and explained me the situation before
> >> banning me directly? It didn't even need to be on chat he could have
> >> PMed me or, as he doesn't like PMs, just told me "please join the chat
> >> #icmp_ratrophy_discussion I need to talk to you privately". No, he
> >> just
> >> told me to look to the topic, and at the time I didn't realize what he
> >> meant, then I've put an "?" and then he just banned me. I mean, was it
> >> really necessary? Why on the f***en hell didn't he just talked to
> >> me and
> >> told this issue, which no one EVER did? And you can see the proof
> >> on the
> >> logs, I was NEVER warned that I was talking so much off-topic sh*t and
> >> was NEVER asked to stop. If I did and disrespected that, of course he
> >> could have a good reason to ban me, as he would have asked me to stop
> >> and I didn't. But not even that happened! I mean, if you have a gun
> >> you
> >> will always shoot first and then ask??? This is insane, and even
> >> childish and I thought I was participating on a very mature community.
> >>
> >> I mean, of course if Ratrophy or anyone have told me that I was
> >> talking
> >> so much about off-topic programs (and they thought I was also asking
> >> help for them, when I was just MENTIONING them, again CHECK the IRC
> >> LOG), I personally would not agree with that but I would know how to
> >> RESPECT and stop doing that, even against my wish. But no one told me
> >> that, I was not able to defend myself, not even to say "ok I will stop
> >> if I am annoying you with that" and then I just got a +b on my face
> >> from
> >> the person I had most respect and consideration in all the channel!
> >>
> >> After that I talked to Ratrophy on #lfs channel and he removed the
> >> ban,
> >> and asked me to rejoin, but frankly, after this episode I don't ave
> >> any
> >> wish to be part of LFS IRC anymore. I an too much disappointed for
> >> that.
> >> If you want, leave your opinions, but for me a ban without even trying
> >> to talk to me first and tell the issue, was really not necessary, a
> >> power abuse, just to show "hey I'm a moderator I can ban you I'm
> >> good!".
> >> Childish!
> >>
> >> And the worst part: I've NEVER saw anyone being banned on #lfs-
> >> support .
> >> The first thing I thought "what the hell did I do wrong???" It was
> >> something like that (not exactly but something like this):
> >>
> >> Ratrophy: Look at your last question, and read the topic.
> >> icmp.request: ? *
> >> * This '?' meant: sorry I don't know what you are talking about I'm
> >> not
> >> understanding.
> >> Ratrophy: Well, I think you didn't get it...
> >> Ratrophy bans icmp.request
> >>
> >> Frankly, sorry for the words I will use but what the f**k was
> >> that??? I
> >> mean, couldn't he have tried to just explain "I think you are talking
> >> too much non-related LFS stuff, maybe you could stop...?" Sure I would
> >> do! I am NOT a teenager and I decided to not be a teenager anymore
> >> since
> >> 4-5 years ago. And since then, I was never banned by any community I
> >> made part of, all the ones I had any issue with its philosophy I left
> >> myself no one had to ban me, by the simple reason I'm not a f***en
> >> stupid bastard who wants to ruin the others fun. The only thing I
> >> could
> >> do if Ratrophy would have proceed like this, asking me to stop,
> >> would be
> >> have taken this subject ahead, about what should be considered on-
> >> topic
> >> and off-topic and maybe suggest people to participate more of the #lfs
> >> channel. I would not complain about this attitude, I would have
> >> respected and obeyed it. IF not, then a +b would be justified.
> >>
> >> But not, he decided to directly ban me, and later talk to me about the
> >> issue, a completely childish, disrespectful, inhuman, POWER ABUSIVE
> >> and
> >> really forgive me for what I will tell now but stupid action. Ratrophy
> >> has given a REALLY BAD image about LFS Staff. When he did it, I was so
> >> shocked that in the first minutes after the ban I couldn't even
> >> believe
> >> it, I was literally FROZEN ahead of my computer because I NEVER
> >> expected
> >> this action from an LFS moderator, specially a so participative one as
> >> Ratrophy.
> >>
> >> All that I can ask now is to the moderators and staff members of
> >> the LFS
> >> Community check the logs and take this issue ahead. If you don't do
> >> this, it can happen again and more people may leave LFS as I'm just
> >> about to do. The main reason I was on LFS IRC until now was not to
> >> receive general help, as for that there are general linux channels,
> >> neither receive lfs specific help as I am already experience very few
> >> problems on LFS install and most of them I am being able to solve
> >> on my
> >> own, so I would just be using lfs mail list to report very few
> >> problems
> >> and that's all. The main reason I was on LFS IRC until now was to show
> >> my support to LFS and be part of a community that I was loving to be
> >> part of.
> >>
> >>
> >> Now for some final considerations about the text I've made:
> >>
> >> - I could have just retired myself totally from LFS project and
> >> gone to
> >> Gentoo, without writing anything. And I'm NOT doing this as a
> >> vengeance
> >> act about what Ratrophy has done. I just, even not knowing the main
> >> participants of the LFS book, that you work really hard, you helped
> >> really much and you at least deserved to know if something wrong is
> >> going on. Until know at least I believed you deserved as much
> >> support as
> >> possible, by knowing what is going on and why a so grateful and
> >> respectful member is about to leave. I could have just said "It's
> >> not my
> >> business anymore, f**k off them all" and not waste 2h of my time
> >> writing
> >> this text, but I feel I would be so unfair to people who work hard
> >> do much.
> >>
> >> - This is NOT a text encouraging normal members to leave. Besides that
> >> episode LFS is an AMAZING project of people who, as I already said
> >> many
> >> and many times in this text, work really hard. Of course I'm about to
> >> leave but somethings make me have enough faith that LFS Staff will at
> >> least investigate this.
> >>
> >> - I am NOT asking punishment to Ratrophy even because who am I, a
> >> strange, a newcomer, against someone who must be already many years on
> >> LFS. Of course I would not have any chance. But even if I had I
> >> think he
> >> contributes enough for LFS and helps enough other members for just
> >> receiving a lecture, like "dude look what you just did...don't do this
> >> anymore..." .
> >>
> >> - I am NOT trying to split the staff and make staff members ones
> >> against
> >> others. That would be TERRIBLE for a such amazing project!
> >>
> >> - This discussion is mainly NOT about what can be off-topic or not in
> >> #lfs-support channel like as I told you if I would be told to stop
> >> talking this things I would have stopped. Then perhaps I would lead
> >> into
> >> a discussion about this but without complaining about no one; the
> >> opposite, with the objective to make LFS IRC more clean and organized
> >> with more specific and clear rules which would benefit the whole LFS
> >> community and would not hurt not even 1% of the respect and the
> >> consideration that I had with Ratrophy.
> >>
> >> - The main objective of this text is simple: I was banned without
> >> being
> >> warned before to stop the behavior that made me being banned; was
> >> "shoot
> >> first and talk later"; I was always respectful and supportive and
> >> frankly I felt myself so much humiliated about this, because as I told
> >> you, I'm an adult and always acted like an adult on LFS and not a
> >> stupid
> >> teenager who just want to make other people's life miserable. For the
> >> opposite, my main objective was always to make the life of the
> >> people of
> >> the channel better as a form of gratitude for all the help and
> >> knowledge
> >> I received all this time from LFS.
> >>
> >> - Normal members are discouraged to discuss about it, as it could be
> >> split into an endless discussion about people defending Ratrophy and
> >> people accusing him and my objective is very far from causing
> >> conflicts
> >> between the members of a project that I have so much admiration and
> >> respect for.
> >>
> >> - This text is mainly directed to the STAFF. If you think there
> >> will be
> >> staff members who will not read this because they do not make part of
> >> the chat mailing list, please forward it to the proper persons/mailing
> >> lists.
> >>
> >> - I just want it to be investigated, nothing else. Please CHECK the
> >> logs
> >> and review Ratrophy attitude and just tell if it was fair and correct.
> >> If Staff opinion is that it was, I'm leaving permanently LFS community
> >> and going to the Gentoo one, not mad or angry with the staff members
> >> (exception for Ratrophy of course) but really, deeply sad by this
> >> occurrence but leaving my thanks for all the great work you made on
> >> the
> >> book and all the help I received, that I was beginning to want to give
> >> it back not only by helping newbie members but on the future
> >> beginning a
> >> dev-tester and a helping contributor for any of the projects, but
> >> unfortunately I won't be able to anymore.
> >>
> >> I really thank and appreciate anyone who read this text until here,
> >>
> >> Estevão Becker (icmp.request / net_priest)
> >>
> >> --
> >> ICMP Request - Don't forget to call me when you ping!
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-chat
> >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
> >
> > Hello Estevão,
> >
> >       It was a hasty decision on my part. Looking forward to your help. I
> > am sorry and am fully responsible for my lack of tact within the last
> > 24 hours.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > William
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-chat
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>


-- 
Processing Key: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-chat
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to