On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, GN wrote: > On Monday 25 July 2005 16:40, Ken Moffat wrote: > [...] > > > kernel 2.6.12 would be nice. > > > > Given timescales, I imagine 2.6.13 will be out. But seriously, > > what do you see in 2.6.12 that isn't there in 2.6.11 ? > Mostly bug fixes. 2.6.12 is stable now, 2.6.13 might be 'bleeding > edge'. IMHO. >
Personally, I bleed on 2.6.12 (my athlon64's ability to power off seems to have been broken by the acpi changes). But, most of the important bug fixes in 2.6.12 should be in 2.6.11.12, no ? > > > > LFS-7.0: > > > > > > [...] > > > Incorporate Wifi. I know this can be tricky, but one can only > > > wish. > [...] > > > > Well, if that's not BLFS, I don't know what is ;) > Almost all notebooks come with Wifi nowadays. I see it as part of the > core in any distribution. Again, IMHO.. > > SeattleGaucho > Almost all webservers run apache, so it needs to be a core part of the distribution. But that's why we have blfs - I don't intend to dictate what you run on your boxes, please don't attempt to overload my build with things that I can't run. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
