On Sunday 17 September 2006 22:13, Christoph Berg wrote: > I also built a glibc 2.4 based system multiple times. Everything > works well and I also noticed the nogroup/nobody issue. Although it > looks, like vol_id can resolve these error. But booting looks better > with added nogroup/nobody.
udev-098 onwards use the primary group of "nobody", rather than "nogroup", for the group. http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commit;h=5c51e31e0e794d8fcdc1225c65985571c9820949 So calling the group "nobody" will work just as well from that release onwards, and some programs might expect this naming (since it seems more common in the Linux world from what I've seen). The other important change with 098 (from the POV of LFS) is that some of the rule key names have changed (the old ones work, but throw up warnings). There aren't actually many keys that need changing in the current LFS rules. Alex :-) -- Pippin Computer Monkey to the Pelican www.oxrev.org.uk, www.corpusjcr.org, www.rev.org.uk
pgpi8dwGnFNdn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
