Alex Merry wrote: > It was different. The getpwnam call was introduced in 098 (see my > other post). Before that it unconditionally tried to become > "nobody:nogroup".
Ah, thanks. Well, as Dan said, we were going to update to udev-100 anyway; I'd think that if we can get that upgrade in soon, it won't be that big of a problem. Matt, I think I remember you were talking about wanting to do the udev upgrade with Alexander's help, or something. If you still want to do it that way, go ahead -- if you have questions, you can at least try asking me. I don't guarantee I'll have a correct answer, but hey, we'll see how it goes. ;-) (I will have to re-read the new udev manpages regarding the rule changes they made in 098. IIRC from the mailing list, the changes can basically be done with a sed on all the rules files; the replacement names for the rule attributes have a 1-1 mapping with the old names. You just have to replace SYSFS with ATTRS, NAME with KERNEL, etc. Or something close to that, anyway.)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
