Relocated from lfs-dev Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/08/07 19:58 CST: >> Randy McMurchy wrote: >>> 1) We don't have to piggy-back the images along as they are already >>> available on disk. >>> 2) The images are updated in our book as they are updated in the XSL >>> stylesheets. >> Well, I don't recall the conversation. The images have been in BLFS svn >> for almost three years and the revision log says they've never changed >> (although the properties have had two unnecessary changes). > > That's great, but I'm proposing we don't have them at all in SVN. > Seems, though, that in the conversation you don't remember, Manuel > mentioned something why we should continue to carry them in SVN. > I don't remember what it was. > > But, the reason I'm writing is that your message doesn't address > either of the two issues above. I'd like to discuss the eliminating > of the 'images' directory in the BLFS book svn.
Why? There have been no problems in this area with BLFS in the three years snce it was implemented. If its not broke, don't fix it. Addressing the issues above: 1. The five images take up less than 4K. SVN control of *all* the content in the book is much more important than an upgrade that may happen automatically. If a change is made, I'd like us to do it explicitly. 2. See number 1. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
