Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/08/07 19:04 CST: > >> But that makes the book dependent on another package. Larry put the >> images for BLFS into subversion in May 2004. I never noticed before >> that LFS did it differently. > > Didn't we just have this discussion? Or one similar? Seems we did. > However, my take is that the images shouldn't be in subversion, but > we should be getting them from the XSL Stylesheets.
I oppose. If we keep images in Subversion, one would be able to render the book on non-LFS machines (e.g. Debian) without overriding the image location in the Makefile. DIY-linux does keep images in CVS. OTOH, if one finds out how to use the existing (pre-installed) images without hard-coding their location into the Makefile, this objection will become moot. And, while we are discussing the XML topic, I would like someone to look at this file from DIY-linux and tell me if this is a valid BLFS XML setup criticism: http://cvs.diy-linux.org/index.cgi/*checkout*/refbuild/README?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
