Randy McMurchy wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/09/07 12:50 CST: > >> I would add "having version control" to that list. Having the images >> in svn allows us to track the history of the images instead of being >> tied to some external thing. > > The "version control" of the images is already taken care of in the > XSL Stylesheets package. We don't need to do it as well. :-)
But the version control is WRT the XSL Stylesheets package, not the LFS/BLFS books. If they changed the images to be twice as big (or twice as small), I don't think we would want those to *automatically* go into the books. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
