On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:54:37 -0700 Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I really do disagree with this stance. As an educative, as well as > > practical project, we should show at least one worked example. Just > > like we do with SysVInit and the bootscripts (which several of us > > don't ever use any more). No one has to use the example, but the > > example itself shows that: > > My 4th paragraph started with: "Having said that, we will probably get > to a scenario where we need to settle on something we will be using > ourselves for the LFS project." > > That would cover the argument you brought up. I fully anticipate that > happening (whether we like it or not). > > Gerard OK, I read that as part of the LFS infrastructure, not part of the build per se. Thanks for the clarification. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
