On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 13:50, Sebastian Plotz <[email protected]> wrote: > I just want to start a discussion, if it would be meaningful to replace > Sysvinit with Upstart ... > > Here are some points for discussion: > > 1. The bootscripts can still be used (like Ubuntu did).
But that requires SysVinit tools. > 2. The LFS user will learn something about old techniques (runlevels) and > new techniques (event based booting) at the same time. True, but not much. > 3. Upstart is more modern than Sysvinit (and it is under active > development). Can we keep up? > 4. Some distributions already use upstart (Ubuntu, Fedora) or will use it > in future (openSUSE, Debian). > > What are you thinking about that? > Sounds nice, but maybe wait? -- later, Robert Xu -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
