Am Dienstag, den 06.07.2010, 13:38 -0500 schrieb Stuart Stegall: > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Sebastian Plotz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I just want to start a discussion, if it would be meaningful to replace > > Sysvinit with Upstart ... > > > > Here are some points for discussion: > > > > 1. The bootscripts can still be used (like Ubuntu did). > > 2. The LFS user will learn something about old techniques (runlevels) and > > new techniques (event based booting) at the same time. > > 3. Upstart is more modern than Sysvinit (and it is under active > > development). > > 4. Some distributions already use upstart (Ubuntu, Fedora) or will use it > > in future (openSUSE, Debian). > > > > What are you thinking about that? > > > > -- > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev > > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > > > Fedora is dropping upstart for systemd. openSUSE is waiting on FC14 > and how well systemd works before proceeding with upstart/systemd. > There's also a ITP for systemd in Debian, and who knows where that > might go. > > Systemd seamlessly supports SysVinit scripts and new event based scripts. > > Fedora Commentary: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/systemd > > Systemd Homepage: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd
Yes, I think it would be meaningful, if we would do the same as the openSUSE community (waiting until systemd becomes stable and usable). -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
