On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 22:50 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Perhaps we should just drop it since neither util-linux nor coreutils > builds it normally and it probably could be replaced with an alias or > script that just does `uname -m`.
I'd be happy to see the Util-Linux version dropped. I'm not really fussed whether we install Coreutils' version or just do the wrapper-script thing. I have a slight preference for Coreutils' binary but only so we don't have something custom to LFS, regardless of how trivial it is. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
